System for playing roulette Method Garcia

For the oldest representatives of the roulette elite, the name Garcia says a lot. And to the one who hears this name for the first time, we say that Garcia was the greatest roulette player of all time. If this player, who lived in the last century, entered the gambling hall, then the present audience knew that she would now witness a merciless duel. In many cases, the fact that in a few hours the bank became easier for several hundred thousand thalers.

If you analyze in detail the technique of betting Garcia, then its simplicity will surprise. He played only very high stakes on simple odds. The height of these rates was so calculated that, in case of loss, it could be increased by another 5 times by 20%. Only at the fifth rate was reached a maximum.

Example: the maximum was 10,000. The first bet was 5000. It was lost, 6000 were delivered. It was also played, 7000 was placed and so on to the maximum. In the case of winning, the same path had to be traversed in the opposite direction. Here we are dealing with a moderate progression, with one kind of D'Alambert's method. With this method, we will try, for fun, to operate with the dimension of Garcia's game. Of course, playing with such huge sums is utopia. But Garcia "in miniature" is necessary where the scoreboard was his example of 5000, put 50 or even only 5, and utopia will become a reality. Garcia played "with the bank." He put on the following solid pattern: after a simple chance showed a four-time stop, he began his game with the first bet for this chance. This was done, therefore, for as long as a unit, in this case 5000, was not won. Of course, it happened that two simple chances at the same time had to be played with different bets.

Mr. Garcia, with this continuity, figured out a hard nut to crack. After playing about four hours, he had to be content with a "modest" win of 38,000 marks. His follower, who placed 50 instead of 5000, won 380 marks, and placed 5 marks - 38. With an objective attitude, one can come to the conclusion that this method no longer corresponds to the modern views on the successful game on roulette.