Start of section Production, amateur Radio amateurs Aircraft model, rocket-model Useful, entertaining	Stealth Master Electronics Physics Technologies Inventions	Secrets of the cosmos Secrets of the Earth Secrets of the Ocean Tricks Map of section
Use of the site materials is allowed subject to the link (for websites - hyperlinks)

THE OFFSHORE IS DEDICATED
PROFESSOR'S ANNIVERSARY ARTICLE
Leave a comment

If a significant part of his life is a person engaged in the analysis of the fundamental foundations of science, then by seventy years he accumulates such a store of knowledge that allows him to predict their fate in the near future.

It so happened that I was engaged in this business for about 25 years in parallel with the performance of the main work. The results were so significant that there were few experts in the world who could understand them. Now it is already clear that they will be the field of scientific interests of the next generations, so I have only one thing - to try to predict the results of their analysis of my scientific ideas. That they were clear to many, I omit numerous mathematical proofs of their reliability.

First of all, these results will affect all the inhabitants of the Earth , as they will be included in school and university textbooks on physics, chemistry, biology, astrophysics and other sciences.

I often recall my ancient colleagues who believed that the Earth is flat and rests on three whales. This was a natural and bold for that time assumption, since the whale is the largest animal. True, such a hypothesis required an answer to the question: on what did the water, in which whales floated, stay? Of course, there was no answer to it, and the authors of the hypothesis apparently believed that their descendants would find it in the future. Of course, they did not expect that the answer to this question would make their hypothesis bankrupt. Surprising is that this situation was repeated many times in the subsequent process of cognition of the world.

Let us recall how Ptolemy formed the hypothesis that the Sun revolves around the Earth . This was also a natural and very logical assumption for that time. It, too, required an answer to the following natural question: why on Earth are warm periods of the year replaced by cold ones? Again, Ptolemy's followers seemed to believe that future generations would find the answer to this question. The scribes of the biblical commandments, in which this hypothesis was reflected, were burned at the stake by those who tried to cast doubt on it. It took about two thousand years to get new scientific information, which this time proved the fallacy of the original hypothesis about the movement of the Sun around the Earth .

The appearance of electricity is a huge achievement for earthlings. The main properties of electricity were studied by Faraday . He found that a magnetic field formed around the wire through which a direct current flows. Maxwell , owning a mathematical tool, described this phenomenon with the help of elegant, as they were later called, equations. It followed that if current pulses flow through the wire, then around it formed pulses of electromagnetic fields that are emitted and propagated in space at the speed of light. These electromagnetic pulses, crossing the antenna of the receiver, excite in it electrons that reproduce the information encoded in impulses in the form of radio programs, telephone speech or telecards.

Here, and there was an obvious question: how does an electromagnetic wave, moving away from the transmitter antenna and expanding, retain its intensity enough to excite the antenna of the receiver's antenna? Answer to this question is no more than 100 years and my contemporaries, physicists - theorists, have already forgotten about it. They so deeply believe Maxwell's equations that they do not even try to simulate a consistent process of transmitting the same information along the wire and perpendicular to it - into space.

Now this problem is solved and it turned out that the information along the wire is transmitted by longitudinal waves of pulses of its free electrons at a speed close to the speed of light. They, at the moment of the pulse, emit photons, which transmit the same information into space at the speed of light. Since the photon is a localized (bounded) in space electromagnetic formation, the total intensity of its electromagnetic field does not change. The impulse of photons emitted by the antenna transmitter excites the electrons of the receiver antenna and, thus, transmits to it the information encoded in the pulse.

In the described process of information transfer, there is no place for Maxwell's equations. They describe mysticism, but not reality, and there is already experimental evidence for this.

Thus, the law of the erroneousness of the original widely known hypothesis on the transmission of information by electromagnetic waves has received another proof of its reliability. It is a pity, of course, that all these years Maxwell's equations acted as a mathematical garbage in the description of the process of information transfer. It's a pity and modern youth, whose heads continue to fill this garbage.

The beginning of the twentieth century was marked by a flow of new information about the microcosm. Experiments have shown that the microcosm consists of nuclei and electrons, the totality of which forms atoms. It was necessary to explain the interaction of electrons with atomic nuclei in order to get an idea of ​​their structure.

The surprising thing is that the approach to solving this problem was exactly the same as that of the ancient thinkers. There, whales, like the largest animals, were carriers of the Earth. Here the device of the atom was identified with the device of the Solar system, in which by that time the planets were already rotating around the Sun. The nucleus of the atom served as the Sun , and the electrons as the planets. So the planetary model of the atom was born. By that time, there already existed a powerful tool for verifying the correctness of such representations - mathematical dependencies between the parameters of the phenomenon being studied. From these dependencies it followed that the electron moves around the nucleus of the atom, like a planet around the sun and, passing from orbit to orbit, emits photons that form spectra. The irrefutability of this idea was confirmed by the fact that the mathematical model describing the motion of an electron along the orbit of a hydrogen atom accurately calculated its spectrum. The reliability of the idea of ​​the motion of an electron around the nucleus of an atom was strengthened by a number of Nobel Prizes awarded to Bohr , Schrodinger , Dirac and Pauli .

True, here, like the authors of the hypothesis about the three whales, but also the hypotheses about the motion of the Sun around the Earth and the transmission of information by electromagnetic waves, a very important question arose: how do electrons that fly in orbits around nuclei connect atoms to molecules? The situation was repeated. Again, it was considered that the answer to this question will be found by future generations of scientists within the framework of the idea of ​​the orbital motion of an electron.

The reader already understands that the described law of the inconsistency of the initial hypotheses is inevitable. The answer to the above question has already been found and he completely destroyed Niels Bohr 's hypothesis about the orbital motion of an electron in an atom. The electron interacts with the proton of the nucleus of the atom, like a spinning spindle, and it, by connecting its magnetic pole with the magnetic pole of the electron of the neighboring atom, forms molecules.

The sad fate of the mathematical theories of Maxwell , Bohr , Schrödinger , Dirac and other scientists required an analysis of the causes of imperfection of the most powerful instrument of knowledge - mathematics. This problem arose in front of me at the end of the last century. It was felt that others did not even think about its existence.

A thorough analysis of the process of mathematical proofs of the connection between the phenomena studied and reality showed that the beginning of this process is the initial concepts and axioms on which the logic of all subsequent mathematical actions is based. Since the axiom is an obvious statement that does not have exceptions and does not require experimental proofs, the reason for the unreliability of mathematical proofs could be one - an incomplete accounting of the axiomatics existing in addition to our will. It turned out that in the foundation of mathematical proofs there was no main axiom of Natural Science - the Axiom of the unity of space, matter and time.

The inclusion of this axiom in the foundation of mathematical proofs of the reliability of the results of all experimental studies was like a hurricane that ruthlessly destroyed the building of modern theoretical physics, and all the theoretical physicists proved to be figuratively speaking in the broken trough. True, most of them do not yet know about this and continue to boast of their mythical knowledge.

The hypothesis of A. Einstein that the speed of light does not depend on the speed of its source was lucky. She stayed alive, but with an important clarification. The speed of light relative to space does not depend on the speed of the source. In appearance, this is a minor refinement, but it buried both Einstein's theories of relativity , which were based on Minkowski's axiom about the unity of space and time. This axiom was incomplete. The ensemble of the Unity of the primary elements of the universe includes not only space and time, but also matter. This immediately led to the erroneousness of the Lorentz transformations, which are the theoretical basis of A. Einstein 's theory of relativity . The consequences of his theories were also erroneous. One of them is the birth of the universe from the point as a result of the so-called Big Bang.

If there really was a Big Bang, then there must be evidence of the existence of the process of cooling the Universe after it. They were found. Investigations of the background radiation of the Universe have shown that in its regularity the blackbody cooling process described by the Planck formula is reflected. From this followed, in appearance, a very convincing conclusion that the universe, like the black body, is in the cooling stage after the Big Bang. Triumph!!! The Nobel Committee this year repeated its error of 1965 and issued a second award for the relic radiation, completely ignoring the evidence published in 2004 that its interpretation was erroneous.

So, the law of error of widely known initial scientific hypotheses is inevitable. It works well in the case of the Big Bang. Evidence of the erroneousness of its existence is based on a deep analysis of the spectrum of the hydrogen atom, from which unambiguously and irrefutably it follows that the background (relic) radiation of the Universe is formed by the process of creation and cooling of hydrogen atoms in the depths of the stars of the Universe that goes on continuously and has nothing to do with the mythical Big Bang .

It is known that the ancient mistaken scientific ideas about the structure of the world in which we live were preserved at first by the mythological creativity of people, then by the inquisitorial functions of religions, and now this role was taken over by the Nobel Committee. Due to the fault of this committee, the authority to erroneous scientific ideas and theories is formed, which are then included in the learning process and are hammered into the heads of the students, depriving it of the opportunity to creatively search for knowledge related to reality. It is difficult to determine the damage caused to mankind by the Nobel Committee. Through his fault, textbooks are published in millions of copies with erroneous scientific ideas, not for educating young people, but for filling their minds with mystical knowledge that have nothing to do with reality.

Thus, the history of science indicates that the primary, widely known scientific hypotheses are usually erroneous, the subsequent - closer to reality. However, this does not exclude their correction by future generations of scientists. My scientific ideas will not escape this fate, but the Axiom of Unity remains an impregnable fortress. Other ideas will be deepened and, possibly, corrected, but how, - it is difficult to predict yet. Nevertheless, in our time, as I believe, they have no competitors in the vicinity of reality.

This is my short forecast of the opinion of future generations of scientists about the results of my scientific research. I understand that it will be completely ignored by my contemporaries. But these are their problems. I have already decided my own.

print version
Authors: Doktor tehn. Sci., Professor F.M. Kanarev
Date of publication 15.10.2006гг

NEW ARTICLES AND PUBLICATIONS
	The technology of manufacturing universal couplings for unbreakable, threadless, flossless connection of pipe sections in high pressure pipelines (video is available )
	Technology of oil and oil products cleaning
	On the possibility of moving a closed mechanical system at the expense of internal forces
	Fluorescence in thin dielectric channels
	The relationship between quantum and classical mechanics
	Millimeter waves in medicine. A New Look. MMV therapy
	Magnetic engine
	Heat source based on pump units