| Start of section
Production, amateur Radio amateurs Aircraft model, rocket-model Useful, entertaining |
Stealth Master
Electronics Physics Technologies Inventions |
Secrets of the cosmos
Secrets of the Earth Secrets of the Ocean Tricks Map of section |
  |
| Use of the site materials is allowed subject to the link (for websites - hyperlinks) | |||
ABOUT THE INCONSISTENT SOURCE OF ENERGY
Cherednichenko Nikolay Ivanovich
It all started with the fact that I noticed a contradiction. The law said that this can not be ever , the statement claimed that it is, it works and we use it every day . And both, the law and the statement are unshakable and the whole world recognizes them. I had to study the problem in more detail and this is what happened.
The law says . Energy can not appear out of nowhere and disappear into nowhere. It is only transformed. The statement asserts that the energy in the form of electrons appears or appears ostensibly from nowhere when the conductor moves in the field of the magnet. If to say it is easier then we have a magic wand, a conductor. When it starts to move in the field of a magnet, so it is pounced on the mass of electrons, "homeless people", who do not know where they lived before, climb into it, run along it, then along wires to TVs, refrigerators, electric ovens. In other cases, science knows where the electrons lived. If they get out of the battery, they lived in zinc atoms. Zinc dissolved and electrons are dissolved. If this static electricity, then the mechanical energy of rubbing does not translate into unknown where the electrons are taken, but only separates the negative and positive charges. If we take a current from a solar battery, we know that electrons from selenium are obtained by the action of light. Even from the gases of oxygen and hydrogen we get electrons. Such fuel cells are on spaceships. But the largest part of the electrons we get from the motions of the conductor in the field of the magnet.
Retreat. I hope you'll excuse me for the fact that the explanations are quite primitive. This is done for ease of understanding. Henceforth I will be energy, electricity, current, voltage, EMF, where it is possible to call electrons or the flow of electrons, and instead of words it is excited, induced, arises, is induced only by a word, because in the question under consideration they describe the same action, the motion of the conductor in Field of the magnet.
So that's it. If you want to learn from the scientists husbands, whence there were electrons running along the wires, then you will be sent in a vicious circle. First, they say that the mechanical energy of the water, the engine, the hands turned into an electric one. And at the question, how did this happen? It will be answered that when the windings of the generator rotate in a magnetic field, electrons appear. When asked where did they come from, where did they live before? Answer. Mechanical energy has become electrical and read in a circle. Some scientists can tell you one more, absurd from my point of view, theory about the transfer of electrons through wires.
Let me quote two sentences from MI Kuznetsov's Basic Elements of Electrical Engineering:
1. If, under the influence of one or another reason, to cause free electrons to move in one direction, then such an ordered motion of free electrons in metal conductors will be an electric current p. 10 ;
2. Electrons that have lost contact with atoms and move in the space between them are called free electrons.
Absurdity is as follows:
1. It is obvious that one or ten free electrons can not transmit all the energy going through the wires. This means that the weakly-holding electrons of the upper orbits must come off from the atoms of the conductor and become free. And in some strictly limited volume of the conductor material there can be a limited number of atoms, and hence free electrons, and there is nowhere to take new ones. They transferred some energy and we used them on TV, radio. Who will continue to bring energy if there are no free electrons in the conductor?
2. If we pulled free electrons from the atoms of conductors, then these atoms became inferior, they lost some physical properties. They have a bigger proton charge.
3. From "Electrical Engineering" p.9 "The number of electrons revolving around the nucleus always corresponds to the ordinal number in the periodic table . " For decades, we have used trillions of kilowatt hours of free electrons, which means that in the atoms of conductors, there are fewer electrons. So, it's time to rewrite Mendeleyev's table? But back to the main topic. Where does the electron appear in the conductor? Since the simplest generator consists of a conductor, a hand moving or rotating a conductor and a magnet, then the choice is not great. The conductor himself can not give up his electrons for a long time, because he will lose physical properties, thin out, collapse. Remain hand and magnet. It is impossible to say that electrons have got into the conductor from the hand. Because it's stupid. It is also impossible to say that they came from a magnet, because in this case the magnet becomes an eternal engine, the eternal source of electrons all the time giving them away, and also because the basic law of physics is called into question. Law of energy conservation. So where do they come from ?????
I want to offer my vision or theory of the appearance of electrons in a conductor moving in a magnetic field. But first we will have to name 5 properties of the magnet that we need to understand this problem.
1st property . Penetration of the field of a magnet through copper, aluminum, that is, materials from which conductors are usually made. The field of the magnet easily penetrates through the thick plates of these materials.
2nd property. The torsional magnetic field of a magnetic field. It can be torn repeatedly, magnetizing them with metal plates or collecting small nails so that they hang with an icicle, and then tear off part of the icicle with a magnetic field. If it's nails made of solid, magnetized steel, they continue to hang with an icicle, if they break off from the soft steel. The science of magnetizing nails and plates explains the orientation of molecules in one direction. Molecules having in their opinion the southern and northern pole, before magnetization, were viewed with poles wherever they like, that is, the south pole could look at the south pole, and the north pole to the north pole. But we will not get into this absurdity either. And after magnetization, the molecules settled in order, that is, the north poles began to look in one direction, and the southern ones in the opposite direction.
I understand that without scientific evidence the scientific world does not recognize RMP . He does not recognize it even if I could provide the device through which the magnetic field is visible and how it breaks away. They would say that the molecules oriented in one direction and the plate became a magnet, because around it a field can be seen. So for me this way of proof is unpromising. Therefore, you need to go the other way. Since the RMF denotes the loss of a part of the energy by the magnet, it will be necessary to proceed to the proof of the energy loss by the magnet. Imagine this experience. We have a moving conveyor on which the balls lie. A magnet is fixed above the conveyor. The ball approaches the magnet, bounces and sticks to it. After that, we take the ball off and put it back on the conveyor. Thus, the magnet raised a kilogram, a ton, a thousand tons of balls to a certain height, and therefore it took some energy to do this work and it can be counted. I do not know whether to remind in this place that energy does not appear from nowhere and does not disappear into anywhere. This example I gave to you to understand that a magnet performing a job loses energy according to the Law of Conservation of Energy and from that it replenishes. And if he loses when picking up balls, he can lose from tearing his field. Of course, some scientists will find it difficult to abandon the old view, but then they will have to explain where does the energy come from to pick up the balls and where did the electrons live before they hit the conductor?
3rd property. Complete restoration of the magnetic field after its multiple detachment. You can check in a simple way. A wooden stick with a millimeter scale is inserted into the hole of the round magnet. It is tightly fixed with epoxy or in another way. On the stick freely wear another round magnet. Magnets must be repelled and one hanging over the other. Measure the distance between the magnets. Take pictures. Rote the field of magnets and measure the distance again. You need to measure in the same place. Than not a perpetual motion machine?
4th property. Penetration rate - disappearance of the magnet field in and out of the conductor.
5th property. The field of the magnet consists of the same electrons that run along the wires. Indirectly, this confirms the electromagnet giving the same picture of the magnetic field and the pole as usual.
Now how everything happens
Since the flux of electrons in the conductor appears only when the magnetic field intersects, it is reasonable to assume that some of the electrons in the field of the magnet have somehow remained in the conductor. I think that the conductor material represents for the magnet field a viscous barrier through which it is possible to penetrate with some difficulty and with the same difficulty leave this viscous barrier. It would be nice to remember that the atoms of the conductor have positive and negative charges and are forced to interact with the field of the magnet as the conductor approaches and moves away. With the rapid movement of the conductor, part of the field of the magnet can not quickly leave the conductor and breaks off like an icicle from small nails. The field electrons remaining in the conductor along the interatomic space move from the zone of their greater accumulation or pressure to the zone of the smaller one. Now how does the magnet recover? If in two words I do not know, but I can assume that the planet as a huge magnet affects other magnets and compensates for a magnetic vacuum that has arisen somewhere. But I'm more interested in how the magnet is restored, but what kind of energy? If the same electrons are lost, then it will not be very difficult to catch them. It will be necessary to close the working generator with a casing of conductors and to measure the electrical potential of this casing. But the form of energy may turn out to be unknown, let's say that which allows atoms and electrons to move. It will be more difficult now.
print version
Author: Cherednichenko Nikolay Ivanovich
Ukraine
PS The material is protected.
Date of publication 10.02.2005гг
Comments
When commenting on, remember that the content and tone of your message can hurt the feelings of real people, show respect and tolerance to your interlocutors even if you do not share their opinion, your behavior in the conditions of freedom of expression and anonymity provided by the Internet, changes Not only virtual, but also the real world. All comments are hidden from the index, spam is controlled.