| Start of section
Production, amateur Radio amateurs Aircraft model, rocket-model Useful, entertaining |
Stealth Master
Electronics Physics Technologies Inventions |
Secrets of the cosmos
Secrets of the Earth Secrets of the Ocean Tricks Map of section |
  |
| Use of the site materials is allowed subject to the link (for websites - hyperlinks) | |||
NEW THEORY OF ELECTRICITY TRANSMISSION
Cherednichenko Nikolay Ivanovich
My article "On an incomprehensible source of energy" may be incomprehensible to some readers. I hope that the theories presented here explain everything fairly simply.
I'll start with what I do not like the current theory of electricity transmission. It says. The ordered motion of free electrons, in one direction is an electric current.
1. Free electrons, these are particles exclusively with charge minus. It seems that the plus charge always sits in a battery or generator and can not enter the wire in any way, since only negative particles, free electrons can move in the wires, and the work of electrical appliances is explained by a run of minus particles to plus or a difference in potentials. Only the whole incident is that the plus particles, even without the load on, that is, when there is no flow of electrons, are already in the wire connected to the plus and the instruments show it. How does the diode work if it can be approached and only minus particles go away? How the battery is charged with a charge plus, etc.
2. The current theory assures that in any conductor there is a huge (since we need to adjust to the consumed kilowatts of electricity) the number of free electrons moving wherever they like. And this means that it is enough to cut off a piece of conductor in which there are no or very few free electrons and it will not transmit the current. Did anyone meet a copper wire that does not transmit electricity? Why would scientists who believe in current theory not draw free electrons out of a piece of conductor and thereby prove that it does not conduct a current?
3. The presence of free electrons in a conductor means that a large number of conductor atoms lost them. These atoms have become inferior. In connection with the enormous volumes of transmitted energy, is it not time to change the numbering of elements in the Mendeleyev table for conductors, in which the ordinal number of the element corresponds to the number of electrons in the atom?
4. Difference of potentials. It is unclear what is meant by these words. Is the difference in the parameters of one substance? For example, 200atm . Pressure in one oxygen cylinder, and 5 in another. Or is it a difference between different substances and it is appropriate to apply such an expression to them? To pump through the load only one substance, this is how to pour only one reagent into the flask. The effect can be on the flow rate, and if two substances or plus and minus converge in the bulb or bulb, then there will be an effect. In the current theory, only negative charges can approach and go to the light bulb. One gets the impression that the current theory considers a proton and an electron to be one substance with opposite charges. But after all, the proton of copper, besides the charge, differs from the proton of aluminum, and even more so of the electron, than it is. If everything were so simple, then adding or taking away protons and electrons, we would make gold from sand.
5. This theory is half-hearted, focused only on electrons. She forgets that in the same coal-zinc battery, when zinc atoms are dissolved, there is an equal number of electrons, the number of protons with charge plus.
NEW THEORY OF ELECTRICITY TRANSMISSION
Electric current is an energy particle of two types moving in the interatomic space of conductors, from the zone of its greater accumulation or pressure, into a zone of smaller ones. The main difference of my theory is that when converging in a light bulb, these particles react and are converted into light, heat, that is, they are consumed. In the old same, minus electrons run through a light bulb, they are not consumed and it is unclear what they brought to it, what is burning in it. Potential difference? And if they did not bring anything and did not expend themselves, then this is a perpetual motion machine.
NEW THEORY OF THE APPEARANCE OF ENERGY PARTICLES IN THE CONDUCTOR
MOVING IN THE FIELD OF MAGNET
To understand it, it is desirable to first understand my theory of electricity transmission, proposed earlier. What does not suit me today? The simplest generator consists of a permanent magnet and a conductor located between poles in the form of a frame whose ends are connected to contact rings. When this frame is rotated, EMF , electricity, potential difference appear on the contact rings.
1. Since only free electrons can move in the conductor of the frame, and these are particles with the minus sign, then the words EMF electricity, the difference of potentials, signify that many particles with a charge minus accumulate on one contact ring, and on the other also particles with a charge minus, But there are a few of them.
2. The device can not show the plus component, but it shows.
3. Why, when crossing the frame and the north and south poles in the frame should only be a minus component, the electrons?
4. We consume kilowatts, megawatts of electricity, that is, we get some sort of consumable substance, and according to the current teachings, only free, minus electrons that are not consumed can flow through the light bulb. So what do we spend?
5. Words. Mechanical energy has turned into electrical, it is only a formulation, if there is no indication of the specific mechanism of this transformation. It is completely incomprehensible how the south and north poles act on the electrons of the conductor.
6. Magnet. The motion of the conductor in the field of the magnet gives electricity. The movement of the conductor near the water, stone, electricity tree does not. So the magnet somehow affects the conductor. And if it works, then it does the work. Performs work - spends energy . Spends energy - it must replenish it or run out . If it does not run out and does not replenish then this is a perpetual motion that contradicts the basic law of physics.
I will give 2 more examples.
1. Imagine the experience. Over the conveyor with the balls strengthened an ordinary magnet. The ball approaches, jumps up and sticks to the magnet, after which we take it off with our hand and again lie on the conveyor. For a minute a magnet at a height of several cm raises a kilo of balls, per day 1440 kg , per month 43 tons . That is, without any supply of energy, to a height of several cm, a weight equal to the weight of 4 KrAZ trucks was lifted. Is not it strange ?? And after all, we did not take into account that there was also the energy of retention, when we tore off the ball with our hand.
2. A magnet and an electromagnet of the same weight are attached to the ceiling. For some time, the electromagnet has spent some energy to hold its weight, but there is no magnet. Is he a perpetuum mobile? Now about my theory. To understand it, you need to name 5 properties of the magnet necessary for its understanding.
1st property . Penetration of energy particles of the ECHM magnet through the interatomic space of certain conductors and other substances. ECHM easily penetrate the space of some substances and do not penetrate through others. This can be verified by experience. Try to move the magnet clip by placing a steel and copper plate between them.
2nd property . Rate of penetration of ECHM through different substances. It can not be the same everywhere. In some substances, the interatomic space is smaller in others, in some, the interaction of plus and minus charges of atoms with ECHM is stronger, in others weaker. And this means that some substances for ECHM represent an impenetrable obstacle, another viscous obstacle through which one can pass and get out with difficulty, through others it is easy to go and get out. I think that this speed can be measured in institutions using plates of different materials with a thickness slightly less than the distance from the magnet to the place from which it still attracts something. We are only interested in those conductors, which represent a viscous barrier to the EECM.
3rd property . A tearing magnetic field. It can be torn to pieces, having broken a magnet, and it is possible to bring a magnet to a substance that represents a viscous obstacle for the ECHM and quickly remove the magnet. Long-distance ECHM will not have time to return to it and remain in the interatomic space of matter.
4th property . Complete restoration of the magnetic field after its multiple rupture. There are several ways to check recovery, but how it happens and most importantly, what kind of energy, this is work for institutions, and not for one person. I can assume that the magnetic field of the Earth compensates for any magnetic vacuum that has arisen.
5th property . The field of the magnet consists of the same ECHMs that run along the wires.
Indirectly, this confirms the electromagnet, which gives the same picture of the magnetic field and pole, as well as the usual one. I also think that there is much in common between the EFM and the energy particles of the ECHM atom, that is, protons and electrons.
A magnet is something like an atom, only one plus charge inside, and a negative one on the surface, at the other pole and it's very likely that they are recharging with one kind of energy. Now about how everything happens. Since the EFM flux in the conductor appears only when the magnetic field intersects, it is reasonable to assume that some of the EFM has somehow remained in the conductor. With the rapid movement of the conductor, near the magnet, a part of the EFM does not have time to quickly leave the conductor and remain in it, and then from the zone of its larger accumulation or pressure move to the zone of a smaller conductor in the interatomic space. When asked why the southern and northern ECHMs in the light bulb interact, and there is no magnet in the magnet, one can answer that for the same reasons as the protons with electrons in the atom. There is a binding to the main database, there is also an equilibrium, there is no binding-interaction begins. And it is not important the cause that destroyed the connection with the base, whether it is the dissolution of the zinc atoms in the battery, or the mechanical detachment from the magnet of its field. Of course, other questions arise, in particular for generators with electromagnetic excitation, but without studying it is impossible to obtain answers. Proceeding from the wrong dimensions, it is possible to build only the house incorrectly, and the erroneous theory takes the whole science along the wrong path.
print version
Author: Cherednichenko Nikolai Ivanovich
Ukraine
PS The material is protected.
Date of publication 02.03.2005гг
Comments
When commenting on, remember that the content and tone of your message can hurt the feelings of real people, show respect and tolerance to your interlocutors even if you do not share their opinion, your behavior in the conditions of freedom of expression and anonymity provided by the Internet, changes Not only virtual, but also the real world. All comments are hidden from the index, spam is controlled.