|
Start of section
Production, amateur Radio amateurs Aircraft model, rocket-model Useful, entertaining |
Stealth Master
Electronics Physics Technologies Inventions |
Secrets of the cosmos
Secrets of the Earth Secrets of the Ocean Tricks Map of section |
  |
| Use of the site materials is allowed subject to the link (for websites - hyperlinks) | |||
Navigation: => |
Home / Physics / Experiment / |
|
COUNTRY DEPENDENCE OF CURRENT LIGHTED ELECTROLYUMINESCENT LAMPS
FROM THE GEOLOGICAL ACTIVITY OF THE EARTH'S NORTH
Viktor Nikolaevich Litvinov
In early 2005 , I decided to remake the lamp on two 20-watt fluorescent light bulbs from AC power to DC. I assembled a typical rectifier with a voltage doubling, shorted the filament, two "twenties" connected in series and switched on the lamp. I was told that practically all lamps burned from direct current, even with burnt out glow. But immediately the lamp did not catch fire. One lamp burns, two - no. A little "pokoldovav" over the lamp, picking up the used b / y, I still lit them, turned off the lamp and went to bed.
Two nights I slept normally, but on the third, turning off the light, I was dumbfounded: both switched off lamps blinked like a New Year tree with some messy, eerie, deathly pale light! And, if, say, in one second the upper part of the balloon is shining, then in the other - the middle or lower. At the same time, two tanks did not immediately light up, one lights up - the other is extinguished. With frequent flashing, it seemed that both cylinders burn simultaneously. But, having looked narrowly, I found out that they are still burning separately.
I did not sleep for a long time, watching the endless play of light similar to the northern lights, but the blinking did not stop. Without waiting for the end of the "illumination", I fell asleep. Waking up in the middle of the night, I was surprised to find that the "illuminations" were continuing. Knowing that the inert gas sometimes shines from the effects of radio waves, I assumed there was a nearby radio transmitter that lights the lamps. But powerful transmitters were not there! Locators of the airport somewhere for two kilometers, and then, if they are "upset", they radiate interference with pulses during rotation. Not long ago, a cellular antenna tower was placed nearby, but according to the cellular communications engineer, it can not be a source of glow of the lamps because it is 500 meters from my house and its power of about 100 watts and operating frequency of 1800 MHz does not contribute to the glow. Fluorescent lamps most often shine under the influence of radio waves of short-wave range with the power of the order of several hundred and even tens of kilowatts.
There was an idea about psychotropic influence. I once read that, allegedly, during the years of "stagnation" people were trying to influence some radiation to neutralize them, or even destroy them. He looked out the window, but did not notice any directional antennas. There was no deterioration in my state of health, and I do not seem to have any bloody enemies, I do not have anything to live on ...
One acquaintance suggested that the lamps could glow under the influence of static electricity, but, holding the lamp with my hand, I took off the possible statics, and the lamp, like in nothing, happened to continue to flash.
I took out the plug from the socket and stopped the lamp flashing.
There was an idea about the poor resistance of the switch. But, when the phase was applied to one wire of the switched off lamp, the flashing resumed. Ie, the presence of potential in 220V on the lamp is one of the conditions for the lamp to blink.
But why did not the lamps shine before? Most likely, because any LDS with a typical switch shunts a capacitor of about 0.033 mph , located in the starter and connected in parallel to the lamp. In the new scheme of supply of lamps it is absent.
Covering, as a studio photographer, a lamp with opaque material, I was convinced that the lamps were flashing during the day.
Nights after three after the beginning of the illumination, I noticed that the lamps blink particularly brightly. In the morning of the news, I found out that there was a devastating earthquake in Japan. After that, I assumed that by accident I made a highly sensitive detector of magnetic, and even gravitational, waves of the Earth. The next night, the blinking was less, and a couple more nights stopped at all. But, "after a pause" for a couple of nights, the lamps started flashing again. Deciding to investigate the effect in more detail, I began to carry the lamp across the apartment. And I was surprised to find that the lamps did not blink anywhere, except in my room. On what my 11 -year-old daughter instantly wisely uttered: it's because you have a lot of iron . Indeed, the lamp on the perimeter is covered with metal products, and it is worth it to move to a space free from metal, as the blinking stops. The power circuit with the throttle is located at the bottom of the lamp, and, as I thought at the time, together with the surrounding metal forms a massive, powerful and sensitive transformer, responsive to changes in the magnetic field of the Earth and the Universe.
The introduction of an additional mass of metal into the "surroundings" of the luminaire stops the flashing for a while. But, after a while, when, obviously, the additional metal is magnetized in the direction of the Earth's magnetic field, the flashing resumes.
During the experiments, when the lamp was moved, I was struck by a diode in the multiplication circuit, and the lamp lost its efficiency. But the blinking did not stop even with a faulty power supply.
After repairing the lamp, replacing the diode and sticking the same lamps, I found that the lamps do not burn (meaning - do not shine in the usual mode). One burns, together - no. Turning the lamp upside down, I found a diode in a symmetrical fluorescent lamp - with one polarity - it burns, while the other does not. I have never heard of it before. And, just picking up the polarity of switching on the lamps, I managed to light them. Lamps blinked the same evening, but, blinking two nights, went out. This happened immediately after the devastating earthquake in Indonesia.
I noticed one interesting feature: if I move the lamp, say, for repair, then after installation to the same place, the lamps begin to flash after a day or two. Perhaps this coincidence, associated with a decrease in the activity of the magnetosphere, and perhaps this is due to the reversal of the lamp choke by a new direction of the magnetic field. On April 11, 2005 , around 11 pm there was an active flashing of the lamps. At 9 am on television reported on a new earthquake in Japan .
When the lamp was turned on, sometimes both cylinders caught fire in the air, which was clearly not enough to illuminate the room, and, accordingly, caused some inconvenience. After all, the lamp, except for the source of experiments and experiments, fulfilled its direct purpose - illuminated the room. I realized that, nevertheless, despite the doubling of the voltage, he lacks current. Some details I put the wrong type and denomination, specified in the scheme. When you connect one cylinder - it was lit quickly and smoothly. Since the cylinders are connected in series, I decided to put the switch with an average position: one cylinder closes and all voltage is applied to the other, the other balloon is closed, and the voltage is applied to the first cylinder if the switch is in the neutral position - Both cylinders are burning. After I installed it, 3-4 bulbs did not flash. Everything, I thought, the capacity of the system, the frequency of the circuit, and the miracle had disappeared. But, there was an earthquake in Japan , and the lamps flashed again. Yesterday , that is, 11.04.05 . I tried switching the lamps, with the light off, the switch closing and opening the cylinders. As soon as I closed any tank, the blinking disappeared. The lamps stopped shining. But, when one of the lamps was closed, she blinked slightly. When another lamp was closed, there was no glow.
Today, 12.04.05 , the lamps do not blink. Most likely, the activity of the magnetosphere fell. Blinking can be restored by grasping the balloon. At that, only the balloon "at hand" flashes. Ie, adding capacity increases the sensitivity of the "device".
There was one more assumption. Blinking can be caused by instability of the mains voltage, causing the appearance of pulses, igniting lamps. But, as you know, the electric meter is a good filter for such pulses. And what serves as the second wire - atmosphere, ether, physical vacuum? The installation comes in memory of V.V. Avramenko , a lamp feeding on one wire. But there is a whole system, - high-frequency generator, rectifier.
Another experience. I have a "grounding". A wire connected to a metal frame of a twelve-story house. On the 10th floor. Maybe more antenna than ground. Zero, in a word. Today, on the day of the lack of activity of my "indicator", bent into a ring a sheet of tin, grounded and put on one balloon until about the middle. The balloon blinked with a small brightness. Another balloon did not shine. Put a grounded ring on another cylinder, it also lit up, and the other went out. The luminaire has an aluminum box at the bottom where a power circuit, a switch and a switch are assembled, and in which two steel (magnetic) tubes are pinched, along which wires lead to vertically standing cylinders. The electrical capacitance between the tube and the power cord of the balloon is approximately equal to the capacity of a coaxial cable of the same length - 70 - 100 pF . I grounded these tubes, and the lamp began to flash with a brightness similar to the brightness in the night of earthquakes! Only the flashing frequency was much smaller. When conducting a ground wire through a metal tube, sparks appeared, which indicated the presence of current in the circuit. An attempt to measure the current and voltage between the earth wire and the frame of the luminaire by the electronic and arrow testers failed. The electronic device showed a slight unstable, constantly changing voltage and current. Moreover, when it is connected in the current or voltage measurement mode, - the lamps did not blink. The needle of the other tester was barely moving, but the lamps blinked at all positions of the switch of the device. Measurement of resistance by an electronic tester, which has a sensitivity of the order of several tens of mΩ , showed an infinite resistance between the contacts of the plug and the housing of the luminaire.
Measurement of the resistance of a 500 -volt megger showed the resistance between the contacts of the plug of the switched-off lamp resistance of about 100 mΩ , and the same between the fork terminals and the metal casing. Ie, any leaks are excluded.
Recently I decided to check the dependence of my "indicator" on the influence of the magnetic field. To do this, he took a demagnetizing loop for the color TV picture tubes, turned it on, and brought it to the flashing lamps. There was a buzz, indicating an increase in the load, but the blinking did not change in any way. Changing the polarity of the plug in the outlet, I brought the flashing loop off to the flashing lamps. The blinking stopped. I had to turn on the loop located at the cylinders, that is, let the current flow through it, as the flashing resumed with a new force. Obviously, the loop switch disconnects one supply wire, and the second supply wire is connected directly to the loop, and the approximation of the inductance of the loop with the phase potential to the bulb of the lamps disrupts some processes that excite the flashing of the lamps.
Having carefully examined the "surroundings" of the lamp, I noticed a jumper that connected the body of the lamp with one of the heaps of metal. It cost me to break the jumper, as the blinking stopped. So that's why sometimes the lamp did not blink! Simply broken contact of the body of the lamp with the piles of metal! When it was restored, the flashing resumed! I have in my room two independent heaps of metal, kilograms of 50 - 100 , not connected galvanically with each other. Manually connecting in turn to each body of the lamp, I observed an identical glow, only with different brightness.
Obviously, the sensitivity depends on the mass, area or volume of the metal.
Hence, my assumption about the electromagnetic effect causing the lamps to flash, most likely, is mistaken. For the demagnetizing loop, generating a magnetic field, would somehow influence the flashing. But, it may very well be that the EMF is small, arising in one turn, formed by a balloon with wires suitable for it.
But the main question remains : what is the nature of the phenomenon that causes the lamps to blink - what is it, or the cosmic particles striking the inert gas, causing its glow, or the instability of the mains voltage, causing the appearance of pulses that ignite the gas, or some other Unknown to science and (or) to me the phenomenon?
Another experience . With the lamp housing grounded, I remove one cylinder. The remaining cylinder flashes with the same intensity. I insert this bottle, take out the first. Again the cylinder flashes and. Switching to either side of the neutral position of the newly installed switch, the closing lamp, causes the lamps to go out. What is the capacitance between a wire meter and a 10mm tube? About a few tens of pF . And this capacity is enough for the current that causes the lamp to glow?
Today, on Tuesday, April 19, 2005, around 1 am, the frequency of flashing increased significantly. In the afternoon I expected reports of earthquakes, but they were not. Conclusion: the earthquakes most likely were, but, or far from populated areas, as if "not noticed" by correspondents, or insignificant, and not worth the attention.
Today, on Wednesday , April 20, 2005, in the morning, it was said that during the day, 2 serious earthquakes occurred in Japan . So, yesterday there was an earthquake, but they did not talk about it! Yes, and this night the activity of the lamps was increased, but I began to doubt something about the objectivity of my indicator ... But in vain!
It is difficult to say whether it is possible to predict earthquakes with the help of my device. But with absolute certainty we can say that you can register earthquakes. And very far from the point of registration. And, obviously, by the intensity of the blinking of the lamps, it is possible to monitor the state of the activity of the earth's crust from my apartment. At least in Japan.
And today I have another experience. Removed the ground from the housing of the luminaire, and connected there the zero wire of the network. Lamps blinked as usual. So, blinking are impulses coming from the network? And the inductance of the meter - is not it a hindrance? You should try to connect to the counter and look at the flashing. Where do these impulses come from? Instability of generators, or inductance in power communications? Most likely these are tips in multi-kilometer power networks that penetrate every house and every apartment, only you need to be able to see them. And for them it is possible to judge the activity of the earth's crust. During earthquakes, huge energy is released, which is partially transformed in network communications, and imperceptibly, against the background of the main voltage, by electric current spreads through the power networks. It is not easy to see the long pulses of small amplitude against the background of a sinusoid of relatively short duration and high voltage! Maybe, for this reason, the light bulbs burn out and the electronics and many electrical products fail? Maybe the increased mortality can be explained by this phenomenon - the harmful radiation of the Earth and the Sun?
Why did the lamps flash when connected to the metal mass? Obviously because the metal occupying a relatively large area lay on the floor, under which the grounded reinforcement was laid, and capacitive communication with it was enough to blink the lamps. More pile of metal - more capacity between metal and reinforcement, better connection and more confident blinking.
Today, Saturday, April 30, 2005 - it's raining. It's been a long time dark, the lamp is off, completely sound, but never blinked. The grounding is permanently connected, it is completely correct, when the hand approaches the cylinder, flashing starts. Either poor emission from the lamp electrodes, and to increase the lamp, it needs to be slightly heated up, turning them on for a short time (as has already been the case for several times that blinking activated), or the activity of the magnetosphere is low, the signal receives a small amplitude signal , And the sensitivity of my indicator is small. And can wet insulators on poles short-circuit the induced pulses of small amplitude, and, apparently, of great duration, to the ground, if not destroying, at least significantly reducing their amplitude?
To answer these questions, amateurish rather than ambitious studies are needed, using serious methods and serious instruments, with which it can be possible to predict serious earthquakes at least a few minutes before the push, which will save people by removing them from the danger zone. Are animals able to somehow predict cataclysms?
It is possible that energy is released from the Earth not along the entire length of the wire, but in places, so to speak, in bundles where the concentration of energy is high. Having installed on the site of the output of the beams some transducers, it will be possible to draw energy from the womb of the Earth, as, for example, hypothetical UFOs do .
Turning off all electrical appliances in the apartment, I found a renewed flashing. When the appliance was turned on more than 500 watts , the flashing stopped. The work of the refrigerator did not affect the blinking. No matter the nature of the load - active or reactive. Again puzzles ... One thing is clear: the periodic lack of activity of my indicator was not always associated with poor contact of the lamp body with heaps of metal or zero wire.
Today, on Sunday, May 1, 2005 at night , I went downstairs, and connected my device to the network in the shield to a general three-phase counter. It is difficult to be objective without good measuring instruments, but it seemed to me that the sensitivity of my instrument increased - the cylinders did not blink almost, and if they blinked - it was hardly noticeable - they glowed with gloomy light almost continuously. Most likely, the lack of inductance of the meter and the current transformer - the impulses are greater. Turning the device on at home, I observed a brief flashing, obviously, before the lamp cooled down, and now - total darkness. Raising a hand to the cylinder, it is possible to restore the blinking, but it is worth removing it, as the blinking stops.
Today, on Monday, May 2, 2005 , in the afternoon, I assembled the power circuit of my indicator without grounding, using as its zero wire network. He carried it into the pantry, where it was dark, and put the plug into the socket. The blinking started as usual. My wife was cooking something: in the kitchen, 2 cooking rings were included, about 2 kW . It seems that the intensity of blinking depends on the total load in the network - more load - less flashing, less load - blinking more intensively. But today, for some reason, the magnitude of the load does not affect the activity of flashing. Today the activity of the magnetosphere is higher, and more are the pulses causing the flashing? If it were possible to receive data from official observations of the Earth's magnetosphere, in order to compare it with my observations!
Taking the plug out of the socket, I turned it over and put it in again, giving the phase to the lamp body, and zero to the throttle. The blinking stopped. Assuming that my indicator is a closed system that does not interact with the environment at all, nothing should have changed, and the lamp should flash as before.
The electrical circuit remained the same, only in places the zero and phase changed. If the blinking stopped, then, in addition to the power wires, the lamp still somehow interacts with the environment.
There was an idea of possible phase distortions, contributing to the appearance of pulses, lighting lamps.
But, at 10 am the cold lamp was actively blinking, and at 14:30 on the same day, on the day off, when in fact energy consumption should not change, it is gloomy and calm. And what is the relationship between the magnitude of the current and the phase distortion? Answer, as I think, only specialists can. But, as my intuition tells me, distortions often arise not at idle speed of generators, but at maximum load.
One more thought . The highest intensity of glow lamps is achieved when the minimum distance from my house to the concentric lines of the magnetic field, excited by solar radiation. The position in the space at which my device is particularly sensitive to geomagnetic disturbances of the Earth, the Earth and the Sun are occupied twice a day - day and night, at about the same time. At this time, the magnetic field of the Earth, excited by the Sun, in my area as much as possible, to which my lamp sensitively reacts.
But what about experiments with the demagnetization loop? Perhaps the intensity of the field is large, but its shape and frequency do not contribute to the glow of the lamps. Perhaps the length of the conductor (in fact, the length of the balloon) is small, in which the EMF is induced.
More serious, lengthy and expensive experiments are needed, so that something could not be assumed, but approved.
Today, on Tuesday, 03.05.05 10:47 , the lamp in the pantry does not blink. Apparently, the magnetosphere, and, most likely, the Sun is calm. The touch of the hand to the lamp slightly activates the flashing. And if in the days of activity, removing the hand from the lamp, you can watch for a relatively long time the residual phenomena - the blinking of the lamps, now the lamp goes out instantly.
This situation persisted until late in the evening. Only at night, having turned off all electric appliances in the house, it was possible to activate the flashing slightly. Entering the pantry in the morning on 04.05.05 , I observed a slight activity - one-time flashes.
Such behavior of the indicator gives grounds to assume that everything is still on the Earth.
Today, on May 4, 2005, I bought 2 new lamps, 20-tki , firm Phillips . I installed them, anticipating intense flashing with excellent emission. Not here it was! Lamps did not blink at all. More precisely, there was a barely noticeable, unstable glow at the edges of the lamps, where voltage was applied. The touch of the hand throughout the balloon had no consequences. When installing the old balloon with the new one, the old balloon flashed, the new one did not react at all. The brain begins to melt slowly. If the fluorescent lamp works a little time from a direct current, does it become an LED? After all, it glows from the impulses coming through a capacitor of very small capacity, and the new one does not shine in any way!
It is possible that the lamps glow from the effects of any particles scurrying in the air. Being in the pantry almost completely screened reinforced concrete walls, the lamp had much less activity than in the bedroom, near the window. Perhaps the activity of the lamp was small also because the power was supplied to the lamp in the pantry by a pair of wires, where the pulses directed opposite to each other were mutually destroyed.
Today, on May 6, 2005, he told about his findings to his comrade, the energy of a solid company. He was surprised to hear my story, and said that for 30 years of work, he had never faced anything like that.
print version
Author: Victor Litvinov
PS The material is protected.
Date of publication 05/17/2005
Comments
When commenting on, remember that the content and tone of your message can hurt the feelings of real people, show respect and tolerance to your interlocutors even if you do not share their opinion, your behavior in the conditions of freedom of expression and anonymity provided by the Internet, changes Not only virtual, but also the real world. All comments are hidden from the index, spam is controlled.