Start of section Production, amateur Radio amateurs Aircraft model, rocket-model Useful, entertaining	Stealth Master Electronics Physics Technologies Inventions	Secrets of the cosmos Secrets of the Earth Secrets of the Ocean Tricks Map of section
Use of the site materials is allowed subject to the link (for websites - hyperlinks)

WITHOUT A CONSTANT MOVEMENT - IS IT POSSIBLE?

Makukhin Sergey

Welcome to the forum

Self-movement of the center of mass of an isolated system - or otherwise - without a support movement - is it possible?
Apparently possible. But all in order.
This phenomenon arises at the junction of classical and relativistic dynamics. Although we know that relativistic mechanics is real, that is exact, since it agrees well with experiment (accelerators), the classical one is an approximation to the real relativistic approximation and it is observed at low velocities and small initial accelerations.

A. Einstein did not believe in self-movement of an isolated system in space at the expense of internal manipulation in it. On the contrary, R. Feynman, a prominent American physicist, did not rule out such an opportunity.
So, if there are two masses, the first of which is much larger than the second, small, and they were originally in the initial common point for them in space, and then began to diverge in a straight line in opposite directions under the action of (hc) Equal forces (the third Newton's law is fulfilled), then in this case the center of mass of this isolated system will shift towards the motion of a small mass, that is, in the self-motion of this system.

To make this clear, remember that the kinetic energy of the body, as well as its mass, increase from the speed increase - the Lorentz transformations for them are well known, experimental confirmation is the growth of the mass of particles in accelerators. Acceleration at a large mass for a given force is much less than for a small one, and the measurement of the achieved velocity for each mass is made during their acceleration.
Consequently, these two masses grow in different ways, as well as the paths traversed by each of them.
For a large mass for a given force of action, its magnitude during acceleration (a small rate of speed dialing) will grow extremely slightly, having a kind of classical invariable meaning. Hence - the path passed to it grows with constant acceleration.

Thus, the product of a large mass on the path traversed to it at the time of measurement is of classical importance.
For a small mass with the same force of action, the ratio of this force to the mass (which grows rapidly, since the rate of its speed set is much higher than for the first mass) - that is, its acceleration every new time in relation to the previous moment - does not remain Constant, it decreases with a constant in time force. Consequently, the path relative to the mass increases at the measured time, since the average acceleration is greater than the acceleration at the measured moment.

If we measure at a certain moment a small mass (the Lorentz transformation) and the path it traveled, then their product will differ from the classical one in the larger direction.

If the large and small masses moved as indicated above for a time, so that the large mass did not increase substantially, and the second small mass increased noticeably, then after a certain time of their divergence, we stop them simultaneously (overlap). Here, the product of a large mass on the entire path traveled, measured at the time of its stopping, will be less than the product of a small grown mass at the time it stops at the traversed path measured at the time of the stop. Note that the paths for masses are measured from the point of their original position (center of mass). And at the time of stopping these two masses are almost equal to the same value as before the stop (the Lorentz transformation). Since they will not go anywhere if you add the radiation mass (radiation) to the point of its emission, that is, to the grown unstable mass (technically possible localization).

So the inequality of two products was described above, and this is nothing more than a violation of the strict classical proportion known as the equality of the relations of the two masses to each other and the inverse relation to them of the distances traveled (here this inequality).

We note that this proportion is closely related (the relationship is transparent) to the position of the center of mass point of the given system and the classical formula for its location.
Obviously, if the proportion is violated, then the center of mass shifts. So, the proportion is broken in favor of the displacement of the center of mass towards the motion of a small mass - a new proportion has arisen (during the movement of the two masses, it constantly changed).

In order for the proportion to be true with respect to the center of mass of the two bodies, it is necessary that the reality be classical, that is, the masses do not change, hence the distances, but relativistic reality and masses change, hence the distances they travel vary, and the proportion for two unequal masses will be violated, that is Go into the correct proportion of the new center of mass.

Here we use the classical finding of the path through the product of the time square for acceleration (average) divided by 2 - this kinematic formula of the path is also true for the relativistic case.
So, if the masses that have been divorced and stopped are now closer together at a lower speed than they had in the middle of the divergence, then the center of mass, slightly shifted, will remain in the same direction as it was displaced in the divergence.

Repeating this process cyclically - constantly, we will get a step-by-step start-stop motion of the system in one direction. Hence we have pseudo-force, pseudo-momentum, pseudo-kinetic energy. And the start-stop pseudo-impulse can accumulate a real counter impulse. And it becomes possible to store kinetic energy.
Now - the first, second, third laws of the dynamics of the system are expanded, without violating the former, including the law of momentum and energy.

If we consider the case when initially the mass is large and the initial small mass is separated by a corresponding distance from their common center of mass, so that the first proportion is satisfied with respect to it and then accelerate them in opposite directions by the same forces, the result will obviously be the same.
Or if two different masses are accelerated by the same forces in opposite directions until they become equal to each other - this case most transparently confirms the above, that is, here the finite masses are the same, and the paths traveled by them from the initial point are different.
The metric of length and time is taken relative to the center of mass of the system at rest. For a transverse mass there is a similar solution. For the general case of longitudinal and transverse mass, there is the same solution. For rotational motion there is an analog.

If there is a solution in mechanics, then it applies to all physics - whether it's electrodynamics or thermodynamics or gravity or its other section. By the way, regarding the latter - it is necessary to take into account the negative potential energy in the calculations.
The author is of the opinion that the self-movement mechanism described above is a solution to the problem of the electromagnetic mass and the nature of gravitons.

A start-stop frame is obtained, relative to it in the inertial reference system and vice versa: time, mass, length and other parameters will fluctuate in magnitude. Perhaps the new system is pseudo-non-inertial.

For the meticulous reader, a few words about the nature of the forces and the location of their source. Forces can have a field nature. For logical resolution of the problem of the delay of signals in the field relative to the center of mass, it is convenient to use the geometric center between the masses, since here again there is a different energy gain of the masses.

So, the solution is checked and understood, hence it is clear that anti-gravity is possible.
In the end, we note that such questions are beginning to emerge from the plane of theoretical reasoning and require their material flesh.

print version
Author: Makukhin Sergey
PS The material is protected.
Date of publication January 18, 2004

NEW ARTICLES AND PUBLICATIONS
	The technology of manufacturing universal couplings for unbreakable, threadless, flossless connection of pipe sections in high pressure pipelines (video is available )
	Technology of oil and oil products cleaning
	On the possibility of moving a closed mechanical system at the expense of internal forces
	Fluorescence in thin dielectric channels
	The relationship between quantum and classical mechanics
	Millimeter waves in medicine. A New Look. MMV therapy
	Magnetic engine
	Heat source based on pump units