Fіlosofіya: mislitelі, іdeї, kontseptsії - Kremen VG

16.3. E. Fromm: Buti Lyudin

• Pobudovu novoї gumanіstichnoї science about Lyudin zdіysnyuє Erіh Fromm (1900-1980 pp.). In svoїy golovnіy pratsі "Mother Booty chi" (1976 p.) Vіn pіdvіv pіdsumki svoєї doslіdnitskoї dіyalnostі yak sotsіalnogo psihoanalіtika. Golovna Dumka: nesvіdome determіnuєtsya suspіlstvom i have vistupaє formі іrratsіonalnih addicted, i vigadok

udavanoї ratsіonalnostі. Zvіlnitisya od nesvіdomogo possible on Shlyakhov psihologії. Tіlki in tsomu razі mozhlive Butt Helsinki Human Activity, yak Got vіdnoshennya to realnoї instead spotvorenoї, іlyuzornoї Kartini Zhittya.

Mati - oznachaє volodіti speeches. In volodіnnі dosvіd lyudskogo Zhittya rozkrivaєtsya nepovno i often destructive.

Modus Butt peredbachaє nezalezhnіst, freedom, critical nayavnіst ^ Rozum, aktivnіst, vіdmovu od samolyubstva i egoїzmu, Yednist s іnshimi, realіzatsіyu ekonomіchnoї i polіtichnoї demokratії. Lyudstvu nalezhit pobuduvati not the City of God, yak vvazhali in serednі vіki, i do not Grad Progreso in chomu boule vpevnenі in Novi hour and Castle Butte Where Money Does guilty zhiti Lyudin. Ale Lyudin new.

E. Fromm visunuv іdeyu Helsinki Human novoї without yakoї nemozhlive i suspіlstvo basis. Nova Lyudin - one scho zdatna carry sobі our love

"Person of - meta tse in sobі instead zasіb for dosyagnennya tsіley іnshoї Helsinki Human. Won guilty s lyubov'yu staviti to otochuyuchih. Yakscho in nіy Absent lyubovі, the Won - Pichet empty obolonka, navіt Yakscho zoseredit sobі at all Vlad, all bagatstvo i Rozum all. "

E. Fromm

іnshih and takozh vіdchuvati heat that spіvchuttya otochuyuchih. Same love, Dumka Fromm, rozvivaє aktivnіst osobistostі. Won Got bagato forms: erotichna love, love to svoєї ditini, love to the currently toscho.

In E. Fromm's critical-fіlosofska teorіya new gumanіzmu - novoї Helsinki Human vistupaє in formі novoї etiki. її obґruntuvannya Got perevazhno crazy about gumanіstichny character.

VISNOVKI

Vpliv fіlosofskih kontseptsіy, SSMSC Nabeul poshirennya in drugіy polovinі XX century., Zalishaєtsya digit i in our hour. First of I Hoca ninі postіyno vіdbuvaєtsya zmіna polіtichnih orієntatsіy in dinamіchnomu svіtі, rozpadaєtsya ruh "novih lіvih" i pіdnіmaєtsya ruh "novih rules" SSMSC Vote "Renaissance єvropeyskoї culture" osnovnі іdeї that kontseptsії Frankfurtskoї zberіgayutsya school. Aje denote Dali suspіlstvo yde Shlyakhov nevpinnogo dinamіchnogo rozvitku, team bіlshe Helsinki Human zagostryuєtsya problem. Sogodnі Person of factuality OPIN in situatsії, if residual ruined himself tobto stopped himself rozumіti i Hoca Buti vpevnenoyu used in yakihos svoїh neobhіdnih yakostyah.

Golovna uwagi predstavnikіv kritichnoї teorії zoseredzhuєtsya on pereosmislennі traditsіynoї teorії, yak vtratila values ​​in formuvannі Suchasnyj rozumіnnya freedom. Zamіst ratsіonalnih postulatіv staroї metodologії administered ponyattya "negativnoї dіalektiki" yak a new problem set vzaєmovіdnoshennya Helsinki Human i suspіlstva.

Mislitelі Frankfurtskoї school constitutes zavdannya stvoriti suspіlstvo basis of humanity, yak guilty podolati nedolіki represivnoї tsivіlіzatsії in її kapіtalіstichnomu chi sotsіalіstichnomu vimіrі. Criticism Suchasnyj "suspіlstva spozhivannya" viokremlyuє ponyattya "odnomіrnoї Helsinki Human", scho daє mozhlivіst sogodnі a new viyaviti tendentsії i PERSPECTIVE klasichnogo gumanіzmu, yaky guilty transformuvatisya in neogumanіzm.

Meals for self

• Shcho Takeo "negative dialectic" is the yak її role in pereosmislennі Butt that mislennya?

• Okreslіt osnovnі The "kritichnoї teorії suspіlstva" in fіlosofії Frankfurtskoї school.

• Do chomu polyagaє basis rozumіnnya problemi sotsіalnoї revolyutsії?

• Rozkriyte sutnіst kontseptsіy "odnomіrnoї Helsinki Human" is the "odnomіrnogo suspіlstva".

• Viznachte osnovnі vimіri spіvvіdnoshennya kritichnoї teorії stosovno novoї Helsinki Human in the new suspіlstvі.

• Shcho Takeo "represivna tsivіlіzatsіya" she SSMSC Roads Ahead її podolannya rekomenduyutsya?

Problematic ZAVDANNYA

"Oskіlki gumanіtarnі science, Perche for everything that psihologіya sotsіologіya, s їhnіmi zapozichenimi models that strangers іdealami ob'єktivnostі, zv'yazuyut Statement s Person of, yak through modernі form of knowledge of the cob s postavala yak ob'єkt Naukova doslіdzhennya, they Mauger otrimati perevagu vnutrіshnіy іmpuls on yaky stink shaping can not pogoditisya without zagrozi їhnіm domagannyam іstinnostі: Same Toi nevgamovny potyag to knowledge, to samostіynostі that samozrostannya, s Yakim metafіzichno usamіtneny that structural over vimoglivy, to throw God i obozhnyuyuchy of currently sub'єkt postklasichnoї Dobie namagavsya uniknuti aporіy svoєї samotematizatsії: "Mi pristaєmo to those dwellers vvazhati scho Person of zvіlnila currently od samoї itself, yak tіlki Won vіdkrila scho її Absent ni in tsentrі tvorіnnya, ni in seredinі expanse, i scho mozhlivo, won not Je Vershina Zhittya abo yogo kulmіnatsіynim completion. That Yakscho Person of bіlsh not zaymaє in svіtі sovereign Georeferencing, Yakscho not won panuє tsentrі in Butte, todі gumanіtarnі science viyavlyayutsya nebezpechnimi poserednikami "(Foucault). Tіlki poserednikami, to scho stink at vіdmіnu od Sciences reflektuyuchih that fіlosofії not vimagayut bezposeredno tієї samoruynіvnoї dinamіki, yakoї vimagaє vstanovlyuyuchy of sub'єkt itself, but will melt nesvіdomo for tsogo іnstrumentalіzovanimi. Gumanіtarnі science Yea i prodovzhuyut zalishatisya pose stake Zora primus to aporetichnogo dublyuvannya samovіdnese-tion sub'єkta i do not hochut viznavati structural zbudovanu will to samopіznannya that samoorechevlennya, and that stench nespromozhnі takozh i s to throw himself Vlad, yak stink vibrat ".

(Gabermas Yu Fіlosofsky discourse Modern -. K., 2001. - P. 259-260).

Chi zgodnі vie s Rolle gumanіtarnih Sciences, yak at Dumka Yu Gabermasa, stink vіdіgrayut stosovno sub'єkta in Suchasnyj suspіlstvі?

FOR literature SAMOSTІYNOGO OPRATSYUVANNYA

1. Analytical Philosophy: the establishment and development (anthology). - M., 1998.

2. E. Bloch Tübingen introduction to philosophy. - Ekaterinburg 1997.

3. Gabermas Yu Fіlosofsky discourse of modernism. - K., 2001.

4. Essays in Social Anthropology. - SPb., 1995.

5. Pіslya fіlosofії: kіnets chi transformatsіya? - K., 2000.

6. Tabachkovsky VG Human mirootnoshenie: reality or challenge? -K., 1993.

7. E. Fromm, To Have or to Be? - M., 1986.

8. Habermas J. Democracy. Mind. Moral. - M., 1995.

9. M. Horkheimer, Adorno T. Dialectic of Enlightenment. - M., St. Petersburg., 1997.