home Management Theory and practice of human resource management - Shchekin GV

Theory and practice of human resource management - Shchekin GV

About evaluation of business and personal qualities of managers and specialists

(Business name)

Date of completion________________

mEMO EXPERT

You have to assess the business and the personal qualities of your fellow workers.

Remember that the objective reflecting the true state of the studied evaluations help workers learn the collective opinion of himself, to correct the deficiencies.

Before you form a set of qualities that characterize the work and personality of the employee. Please rate the degree of manifestation of each quality for the following system.

Conscientiously answer all questions.

Try to give a reasonable assessment of each of its motivation, and in the presence of an employee known to you any distinct qualities not covered by the questionnaire, specify them.

With all the obscure questions, please contact the head of the study (last name, first name, tel._).

Pass counter filled questionnaire in a sealed envelope and at the appointed time.

Exchange of views with other employees is not allowed.

Your opinion can not be made public.

Thank you for your work.

Indicate which quality than those listed in the questionnaire, pronounced in estimated employee, and briefly justify their assessment ___________________________________

Form 2

Head of department (Department)

(Surname, initials)

ORDER

"The selection of experts"

The company carried out a case study to assess the business and personal qualities of employees in order to improve the selection and placement, as well as identify the most promising professionals to be credited to the reserve for the nomination.

You should make a list of candidates for experts listed in the attached form your unit workers to be examined. Candidates for the experts are selected from among reputable positively proven professionals both your and adjacent units, can give an objective assessment investigated, knowing it for at least a year for the joint production of work, study, not being with them in related or conflicting relationships and have given their consent participate in the study.

An expert may be involved in the evaluation of several of the studied workers.

Learning the employee must not know the composition of the group of experts to evaluate it.

Selection of experts is carried out taking into account the three levels of posts in relation to the position of the respondent (the higher, equidistant, downstream), at the rate of 4-6 people. on each level.

The list of experts please introduce me to __________ (insert date)

Appendices: 1. List of studied workers and candidates for experts. 2. Guidelines for the selection of experts.

Deputy Director General for Human Resources (personnel manager)

(Date, signature)

Form 3 Confidential

List of studied workers and experts

(Unit name) (example of filling)

* Counts 1, 5, 8, 11, fills the leader of the study.

End of form 3

Head of department (Department) (date, signature)

Form 4

Recommendations for the selection of experts to assess the business and personal qualities of managers and specialists of the enterprise

Note. For each employee selected under study at least 4-6 experts from each group of posts.

Form 5

Characteristics of business and personal qualities of the employee

Code studied employee

For Official Use Only (after specifying studied employee names)

1._

(Full Name)

Year of birth Education ______________ ________________________

_____________________Specialty___________________________

Place of work, position________________________

Experience in the post ________________________________

2. The total GPA of expert assessments ____________________________

Meets area ____________________________________________

Number of ratings in the areas of:

-___________ Zone 1, Zone 2 -___________, Zone 3 -_____________

The most highly appreciated qualities:

The lowest priced qualities:

Experts rate groups:

higher ____________ ________________ equidistant,

downline _________________

3. Conclusions and recommendations:

Counter (date, signature)

Head of research

(Date, signature)

For Official Use Only (after specifying studied employee names)

Summary of the expert

Counter

Form 6

For Official Use Only (after specifying studied employee names)

Form 7

Summary table of the average expert arranged in descending order

The overall average score for all employees

Counter

Form 8

estimates of the studied workers, the total average score qualities

(Date, signature)

Form 9 For internal use only (after specifying the names of the studied workers)

List of studied workers in descending order of total average score of expert assessments on all quality

Counter

Head of research

(Date, signature)

(Date, signature)

Using the results of the study

Analysis of assessments of business and personal qualities of employees, correct and timely use of its results create conditions to increase the level of organizational work with the staff. Analysis of the results of the study should be conducted to meet the requirements for positions that are occupied by workers studied, and the level of the estimates for each quality.

The analysis of expert estimations gives the opportunity to study the employee to see the positive and negative aspects of their activities through the lens of public opinion allows for individual work with the specialists studied, familiarize with estimates characterizing their activities and make appropriate recommendations to address the shortcomings. It can be provided as handing them a "chart attributes" with an explanatory note.

Introduction workers with the results intended to encourage their efforts to remedy existing shortcomings, to draw attention to the discrepancies between the valuation of certain qualities of experts and self-esteem.

It concludes preference on the basis of a comparison of the estimates of a candidacy for the nomination of the personnel reserve, as well as appointments and movements of workers.

Identifies those not sufficiently competent in the organization and management of production. They can be organized training courses or decided on their direction of studies being discontinued.

At the next chairman of the evaluation commission of certification passed research materials that are used to assess the performance of certified and make appropriate recommendations.

Analysis of the average scores of employees Quality assessment also allows to determine the overall level of personnel management in the enterprise or in separate structural divisions and to draw conclusions on the areas of personnel work, to which you should pay particular attention. Develop measures for improving the system of payment and stimulation of work on improvement of educational work and management style.