home Accounting, auditing books Treaty od AZ - Vodop'yanova O. - 2 Chastina

Treaty od AZ - Vodop'yanova O. - 2 Chastina

VІDPOVІDALNІST UCHASNIKІV SIMPLE TOVARISTVA

Participants simply tovaristva bear Taku vіdpovіdalnіst for spіlnimi zobov'yazannyami:

1) chastkovu - Leather participant vіdpovіdaє for spіlnimi dogovіrnimi zobov'yazannyami proportsіyno to vartostі yogo contribution Yakscho dogovіr simple tovaristva not pov'yazany Zi zdіysnennyam yogo uchasnikami pіdpriєmnitskoї dіyalnostі;

2) solіdarnu - for spіlnimi zobov'yazannyami, scho not vinikli s contract, and takozh for vsіma spіlnimi zobov'yazannyami Square od pіdstav їh viniknennya, Yakscho dogovіr simple tovaristva pov'yazany Zi zdіysnennyam yogo uchasnikami pіdpriєmnitskoї dіyalnostі (article 1138 CMC)..

W time pripinennya agreement of a tovaristva yogo Participants carry solіdarnu vіdpovіdalnіst for nevikonanimi spіlnimi zobov'yazannyami schodo tretіh osіb (h. W Art. 1141 CMC).

Vіdpovіdno to the station. CMC 525, one-sided vіdmova od vikonannya zobov'yazannya th sided zmіna minds agreement not dopuskaєtsya for vinyatkom vipadkіv, peredbachenih law. Schodo agreement about spіlnu dіyalnіst chinne zakonodavstvo such vipadkіv not peredbachaє. Otzhe, Leather s uchasnikіv agreement about spіlnu dіyalnіst Got right staviti power about dostrokove rozіrvannya tsogo contract (s vihіd number uchasnikіv spіlnoї dіyalnostі) on zagalnih pіdstavah s doderzhannyam vimog, peredbachenih Art. 11 GPKU.

The right vіdmovitisya od contract spіlnoї dіyalnostі Mauger skoristatisya participant bezstrokovogo agreement of a tovaristva. The participant agreement of a tovaristva, ukladenogo on viznacheny lines abo contract, Money Does dosyagnennya methylene viznacheno yak skasuvalna Umov, Got the right to have the contract vimagati rozіrvannya vіdnosinah s іnshimi uchasnikami through more important cause of the participant s vіdshkoduvannyam іnshim real zbitkіv, zavdanih rozіrvannyam contract (Part 2 of Art . 1142 CMC).

Ale: "Yakscho dogovіr simple tovaristva not pripineny CCB for participant stated about vіdmovu od podalshoї in nomu uchastі abo have razі rozіrvannya contract for one vimogu s uchasnikіv, participant, fate yakogo in dogovorі pripinilasya, vіdpovіdaє before tretіmi personages of spіlnimi zobov'yazannyami, SSMSC vinikli in perіod yogo uchastі in dogovorі simple tovaristva yak participant agreement "(Art. 1143 CMC).

ZMІNI TA ROZІRVANNYA GOSPODARSKIH DOGOVORІV

Pіdpriєmstvo chi organіzatsіya, SSMSC vvazhayut for neobhіdne zmіniti chi rozіrvati dogovіr, nadsilayut Offers about tse drugіy storonі for the contract.

Pіdpriєmstvo, organіzatsіya, SSMSC won propozitsіyu about zmіnu chi rozіrvannya contract vіdpovіdayut on neї not pіznіshe 20 dnіv pіslya obsession Offers. Yakscho pіdpriєmstva th organіzatsії not dosyagli Zgoda schodo zmіni chi rozіrvannya contract and takozh in razі neoderzhannya vіdpovіdі in establishing lines of s urahuvannyam Poshtova obіgu, zaіnteresovana side Got the right to send out to the spіr on virіshennya gospodarskogo court.

PRIPINENNYA agreement of a TOVARISTVA TA PODІL LANE

Dogovіr simple tovaristva (article 1141 CMC.) Pripinyaєtsya in razі:

1) viznannya participant nedієzdatnim, bezvіsti vіdsutnіm, obmezhennya yogo tsivіlnoї dієzdatnostі, Yakscho domovlenіstyu mіzh uchasnikami not peredbacheno zberezhennya contract schodo іnshih uchasnikіv;

2) announced participant bankrutom, Yakscho domovlenіstyu mіzh uchasnikami not peredbacheno zberezhennya contract schodo іnshih uchasnikіv;

3) smertі fіzichnoї individuals - participant abo lіkvіdatsії yuridichnoї individuals - an agreement of a participant tovaristva, Yakscho domovlenіstyu mіzh uchasnikami not peredbacheno zberezhennya contract schodo іnshih uchasnikіv abo zamіschennya participant, yaky died (lіkvіdovanoї yuridichnoї individuals) Yogo spadkoєmtsyami (pravonastupnikami);

4) vіdmovi participant od podalshoї uchastі in dogovorі simple tovaristva abo rozіrvannya contract for one vimogu s uchasnikіv, Yakscho domovlenіstyu mіzh uchasnikami not peredbacheno zberezhennya contract schodo іnshih uchasnikіv;

5) agreement of a string zakіnchennya tovaristva;

6) vidіlu chastki participant on vimogu yogo lender Yakscho domovlenіstyu mіzh uchasnikami not peredbacheno zberezhennya contract schodo іnshih uchasnikіv;

7) dosyagnennya methylene tovaristva abo nastannya obstavin, if dosyagnennya methylene tovaristva was nemozhlivim.

Vіdpovіdno to h. 2 tablespoons. 1141 CMC, "in an agreement of a razі pripinennya tovaristva rechі, peredanі in spіlne volodіnnya that (ABO) koristuvannya uchasnikіv, povertayutsya participant, SSMSC їh Nada without vinagorodi, Lots Other Yakscho not peredbacheno domovlenіstyu storіn".

Rozpodіl lane, scho is staying at spіlnіy vlasnostі uchasnikіv, that zagalnih vimog right vimogi, SSMSC vinikli them, in order zdіysnyuєtsya rozpodіlu spіlnoї vlasnostі of Art. 367 CMC (for domovlenіstyu storіn). When tsomu participant, yaky vnіs in spіlnu vlasnіst rіch, viznachenu іndivіdualnimi acquaint themselves, Got the right to have the contract of simple razі pripinennya tovaristva vimagati ship in order Povernennya Yomou tsієї rechі of minds doderzhannya іnteresіv іnshih uchasnikіv i kreditorіv.

Krіm of yak zaznacheno in Roz'yasnennі SACU od 28.04.95 p. №02-5 / 302 fallow od obstavin specifically one z uchasnikіv spіlnoї dіyalnostі Mauger zvernutisya to іnshogo participant (uchasnikіv) s Call about vitrebuvannya svoєї chastki Lane s unlawful volodіnnya (vіndikatsіya) abo s negatornogo Call, tobto usunennya about whether yakih torn down Svoge rights hoch bi tsі torn down i do not boule poєdnanі s pozbavlennyam volodіnnya Main (Art. 387 i Art. 391 vіdpovіdno CMC).

Vodnochase at rozpodіlі pributku pіslya pripinennya spіlnoї dіyalnostі treba zvazhati on okremі nuances Povernennya vnesku. So, in odnіy Zi right (Holds VGSU od 25.01.2006 r. In spravі №9 / 54) for a Call s uchasnikіv agreement about spіlnu dіyalnіst VGSU dіyshov such visnovkіv. For the contract in viglyadі vneskіv one s uchasnikіv Bulo passed the act priymannya peredachі-Main, INSHI goods and materials, and the other - tіlki labor force participation that have nayavnі koristuvannі zemelnі dіlyanki. Pributki dіlilisya 50% to 50%. The I Yakscho court apelyatsіynoї іnstantsії dіyshov visnovku to scho in such razі, yak already houses pіslya pripinennya spіlnoї dіyalnostі Purshia participant Mauger vimagati Povernennya vnesku s chastkoyu pributku then VGSU zaznachiv: rozpodіl vitrat that zbitkіv Got vstanovlyuvatisya abo law abo contract. A oskіlki parties do not podbali about Tse pid hour ukladennya agreement about spіlnu dіyalnіst, the courts slіd vihoditi іz zagalnih position of about vidіl chastki lane, scho Yea in spіlnіy chastkovіy that sumіsnіy vlasnostі (Article 364, 370 -. 372, 1142 CMC).

PODІL LANE SHCHO is staying have SPІLNІY CHASTKOVІY VLASNOSTІ

1. Main, is staying at scho spіlnіy chastkovіy vlasnostі, Mauger Buti podіlene in naturі mіzh spіvvlasnikami for domovlenіstyu mіzh them.

2. razі podіlu spіlnogo Lane mіzh spіvvlasnikami right spіlnoї chastkovoї vlasnostі on Demba pripinyaєtsya.

3. Dogovіr about podіl neruhomogo lane, scho Yea in spіlnіy chastkovіy vlasnostі, ukladaєtsya in pismovіy formі i pіdlyagaє notarіalnomu posvіdchennyu.