home Political economy Основы економічної теорії: політекономічний аспект

Основы економічної теорії: політекономічний аспект

§ 3. Post-Keynesianism: New Criticism of Keynesian-Neoclassical Synthesis

At each other half of the 60's rockies in the middle of the economy of the economy of Keynes, we have a new turn. Proverbs of the Neo-Neighborhood R. Clauer, A. Leijonhuwud, R. Burrow, G. Grossman, P. Devidson, S. Wein-traub (USA), J. Robinson, R. Kahn, G. Sheckle, N. Kaldor (United Kingdom -taniya) those інші emerged from the criticism of Keynesian-neoclassical synthesis and alternative Keynesian philosophical theories. In its right-hand clause, critics began to pose the same questions about the "standard Keynesian model" - one of the few in the series of possible Keynesian theories. Звідси - витоки чіткого розрізнення еконо-мічної теорії most Keynes yo yogo poslіdovnikіv yak such, scho rіznyatsya між собою. On the opposite of Keynesian-neoclassic synthetics, abo "classical Keynesianism," the vicinities of post-Keynesianism, nasampered "monetary" and "new."

Vistupayuchi s pozitsіy nevіdpovіdnostі keynsіansko-neoklasich-phase synthesis lіterі i spirit spravzhnoї ekonomіchnoї teorії Keynes postkeynsіantsі paying ob'єktom criticism OAO All suttєvі Elements syn tezu. Pong dіyshli visnovku: "Do not Varto spriymati vseryoz yak methodological dosyagnennya povnoї zaynyatostі so i Recipes Borotba proti іnflyatsії, proponovanі keynsіantsyami neoklasichnogo directly SSMSC vitlumachili on svіy way i spotvorili zaproponovanu Keynes model in rezultatі chogo Won vtratila vnutrіshnyu strunkіst i stopped vіdbivati ​​real camp Sprav "(P. Devisson). This rank, critics pidrivali status panyuchoї orthodoxy and classic situation. In 70 Rokach stink Doda zvinuvachennya to address "uyav-them" ( "self-appointed") keynsіantsіv in fact scho svoїmi "bezvіdpovі-distant vitlumachennyami" teorії Keynes stink "zavdali velichez-noї Skoda ekonomіchnomu rozvitku, polіtichnіy sistemі, Progreso i stabіlnostі "(S. Weintraub). Situation, scho folded all the worlds of Kei-nsianism, M. Blaug characterized the counter-revolution and the "criticism of the bug-and-tobacco confrontation with the development of macroeconomic theory." Prote in one hour yak provіdnі criticism keynsіansko-neokla-toxic-synthesis (R. Klauer, Leyonhuvud A., S. Weintraub, X. The Mіn-skі that іn.) Pretenduvali the role of nayposlіdovnіshih іnterpretato-rіv ekonomіchnoї teorії Keynes INSHI vіdomі vchenі ( L. Yeeger, R. Jackman, L. Harris, M. Blaug) podkreslyuvali suburbanity vlasnyh form-mulyuvan Keynes z pozdnyonyam predstavnykіv synthesis.

Розкол і хитання в стані прибічників економічної теорії Keynes pіdravali klassichnu situatsіyu, scho іnnuvala. Однак вирішальну role in її порушенні all fought against інші chinniki. In a nutshell, - tse krizovoy processes in the development of the state of the rink. I will emphasize the role of the fund for the economic crisis of 1974-1975. - найбільш значна після "великої депресії" 30-х років. In ekonomіchnіy lіteraturі not vіdchuvaєtsya nestachі in postanovtsі predstavnikami vsіh napryamіv in direct phone reception krizovoe protsesіv in rinkovіy ekonomіtsі іz Creasy keynsіanstva zasnovanoї on nomu ekonomіchnoї polіtiki. Prote spil-ni visnovok - vidneni z "keynsianskoyu revolyutsіyu" pokinche-no-otrymuyu rіzne traktuvannya zalizhno vіd napryu, osnovnі polo-zhennya yakogo spovіduє ti chi іnshy vchcheny. For postkeysyntsiv vin znachaet zawnad "hibnogo" Keynesian-neoclassic synthesis and superstructure on the shvidke vidrodzhennia "spravozhny" ekonomichnoi teorii Keynes.

Differently-valued role nalezhala polіtichnomu chinniku - borotbі dvoh tendentsіy in suspіlnіy svіdomostі, іdeyno-polіtichnomu zhittі zahіdnogo suspіlstva - lіberalno reformіstskіy-i-conservative nіy. At the bottom of the reforms, priishov conservatism.

Thirdly, the importance of the Mali processes in the development of the economy-noir theory pose the boundaries of Keynesianism. In the minds of freedom of creativity and tolerance of criticism of the panjuchoi orthodoxy, opponents, nasam-before monetary, led attacks on the "classical Keynesianism." The predecessors of neo-unityism, the shod of monetarism, poddav criticized the economics of Keynes, and її hibnі інтерпре-

Tatsії. However, I did not steal the fact of a real real vintage for monetarism on the residual of the Third Classification of the country and on the tiisically charged nature of the intensive new state of affairs in the new economical theory.