This page has been robot translated, sorry for typos if any. Original content here.

History of Economic Studies - Kornіychuk L.Ya.

Labor (Fabian) model of "economy"

The model has transferred the evolution of power from private to sloppy (state) with a share of accentuation, as well as direct nationalization. There are few laws regarding the absence of various forms of moisture in ambushes of a public corporation, but in the nationalized sector there is little but no control of the parliament (but not of the authorities of the state). The dyalnost of sovereign enterprises, such as private and cooperative ones, spread out in ambushes of self-financing and self-sufficiency. Ale nationalization sector maw the right to receive postures and subsidies.

When writing other news, if you have the leadership of the parliament, the vibro-roles of labor, the intensive process of improving the model, the advanced nationalization and corporatization of enterprises. The enterprises of the most prominent business galleries, the English Bank, and also see all the transport, put the power on hold. For example, 70's pp. the share of the sovereign sector in GNP became 12%, sovereign investment - about 40%, on sovereign enterprises 20% of the output was released, 19% of the total number of business loans went ahead. Tse gave p_dstavi talk about the transition to the "system zmіshanoї economy".

Widespread procrastination of planned beginnings - one more of the main software programs of the Labor model. Labor was perceived as the decline of the economy and economic growth, the cartels of industry, the expansion of the sovereign sector in the economy. The model was passed on a directive plan for planning completely sovereign enterprises and indi - cative corporations.

According to the model, the model’s market was primed on the basis of the principle of market relocation, that plan wasn’t completely eliminated, the mechanism of protection, the number of goods needed, the amount of goods needed were changed, and the amount of goods needed was changed.

Nationalization and sovereignty for corporate activity helped the government to control the development of the social sphere and the planned management of the infrastructure. Vitrati in the social sphere (social care, health protection, health, life and life) became nearly half of all vitrates of the sovereign budget.

The labor model of the "economy" as the only "public corporation" was significantly less occupied by the system of control over economic power, which was recognized by the third force - trade union committees. Profsіlkovy rukh did not interfere with control functions, but vіdіgrav constructive role as an organizer of virobnitstva. Victory і "syndical model" of the participation of workers in management, so the title of robotic control.