home Cultural Ukraїnska that zarubіzhna culture - Vechіrko RM

Ukraїnska that zarubіzhna culture - Vechіrko RM

NOVA SOTSІOKULTURNA REALNІST In UKRAЇNІ

1. Sotsіokulturnі modernіzatsіynі transformatsії.

2. Formuvannya novoї sotsіokulturnoї realnostі that її RISS.

3. Natsionalna culture in the minds zrostannya natsіonalno, kulturnoї іdentichnostі.

Sotsіokulturnі modernіzatsіynі transformatsії

Rozvitok ukraїnskoї culture postіyno vіdbuvaєtsya in minds nesamostіynostі її sotsіalnogo i sovereign encampments, scho strimuє її Postup i generally produces no tіlki to nepovnoti її structure (I. Dzyuba) and the second to nakopichennya not realіzovanoї kulturnoї napruzhenostі.

At once s note s kіntsya XIX - XX century cob. ukraїnska culture potraplyaє field svіtovih mogutnіh techіy modernіzatsіynih protsesіv, SSMSC prodovzhuyutsya i to i sogodnі SSMSC suttєvo transformuyut її zmіst, while the 20 Rokach zooms її zlet svіtovogo value Especially in sferі Mistetstvo, yaky nazivayut "Zoryane hour ukraїnskoї culture."

Vihodyachi s tsogo, Suchasnyj camp ukraїnskoї culture Mauger Buti zrozumіlim s urahuvannyam spetsifіki modernіzatsіynogo processes in Ukraїnі in tsіlomu on tlі svіtovih cultural transformatsіynih for Change.

Basics teorії i practice transformatsіyno cultural peretvoren Je teorіya modernіzatsії. Practice Well modernіzatsіynih Change log pov'yazuєtsya s prosvіtnitstvom, іndustrіalіzatsієyu, vіdhodom od traditsіynogo suspіlstva. Away sotsіalny rozvitok pov'yazany s pereotsіnkoyu tsіnnostey modernіzmu on the cob XX century. i formuvannyam postmodernіstichnih tendentsіy, SSMSC odnі authoritarian vvazhayut spadkoєmnimi modernіzmu and INSHI їh zaperechennyam.

Tsі processes vіdobrazhayutsya in novіy sotsіokulturnіy realnostі, yak skladaєtsya sogodnі in Ukraїnі.

Vіdpovіdno to such minds of Ukrainian Especially transformatsії Je nasampered nezavershenіst one modernіzatsіynih protsesіv i nakladannya them іnshih, rіznih for svoєyu nature, scho porodzhuє efekt їh superechlivogo іsnuvannya and іnodі th simbіozu. Thus, processes nezavershenoї dorevolyutsіynoї modernіzatsії zmіnyuyutsya Radyans'ka sotsіalіstichnoyu modernіzatsієyu, іnshoyu for zmіstom, character i sotsіalnoyu spryamovanіstyu, yak TER dosyagla svoєї methylene i bula interrupted Especially perіodom perebudovi yak promіzhnoї eksperimentalnoї forms in yakіy deyakі Elements of culture kapіtalіstichnogo suspіlstva vikoristovuvalis to do updates sotsіalіstichnih tsіnnostey.

Suchasnyj perehіdny perіod transformatsії ukrajins'koho suspіlstva i yogo culture harakterizuєtsya rіznogolossyam dovolі stіykih utvoren sotsіalіstichnoї culture, vіdtvorennyam korenіv etnіchnoї culture, kristalіzatsієyu new rіvnya natsіonalno-kulturnoї samosvіdomostі, Suchasnyj yavischami modernіzatsіynoї culture zahіdnogo shtibu, osvoєnnyam globalіzatsіynogo cultural expanse, bulk naroschuvannyam zrosіyschennya, yak quickly vіdpovіdaє novim modernіzatsіynim require, more often zadovolnyaє їh creates bіlshogo circulation and i іnodі of Quality, nіzh Ukrainian. Yak uvazhaє I. Dzyuba, "maєmo kontsentrovany zovnіshnіy TISK zadlya zabezpechennya naslіdkіv rusifіkatsії that їh pogliblennya" [4]. Novі globalіzatsіynі vikliki digit mіroyu vikrivlyuyut, not korist ukraїnskіy natsіonalnіy kulturі, svіtovy cultural Prostir, spіvvіdnosyachis s postmodernіstskimi tendentsіyami, SSMSC proyavlyayutsya in іnformatizatsії, novih directly rozvitku Mistetstvo, principles kulturnoї tvorchostі, novіy naukovіy metodologії, polіfonії crops in furrows trivalogo іstorichnogo hour.

Together s note forsovana globalіzatsіya suprovodzhuєtsya zahіdnim "cultural іmperіalіzmom" digit mіroyu amerikanskogo zrazka. Obviously slіd pogoditis s Dumka vіdomogo culturologist I. Dzyuba, yaky uvazhaє scho "globalіzatsіyu - in tsomu spetsifіchnomu znachennі - Can rozglyadati yak" kapіtalіstichnu "alternative komunіstichnіy іdeї іnternatsіonalіzmu, s note, however, carried the scho Stop sobі nezrіvnyanno bіlshy gumanіstichny zmіst" [4, p. 9].

In suchasnіy nautsі vikristalіzuvalis in the main Dvi modelі modernіzatsії: vesternіzatsіya i "nazdoganyayucha" model. Persha model harakterizuєtsya transition od traditsіynogo suspіlstva to Suchasnyj Shlyakhov direct transfer structures, a process tehnologіy i Zhittya zahіdnogo suspіlstva i harakterizuєtsya korіnnimi zmіnami access in all areas suspіlstva. Prote tsya model viyavilas neefektivnoyu i generally produces up ruynatsії natsіonalnoї culture.

"Nazdoganyayucha" model modernіzatsії, yak ґruntuєtsya on organіzatsії gromadyan s metoyu іndustrіalіzatsії suspіlstva, vihodit s nastanovi scho Zahid stoїt on mіstsі not vrahovuє INCREASING dinamіzmu tsogo suspіlstva. Yak stverdzhuє VT Fedotov Kraina LICs have perehіdny perіod pripuskayutsya pomilki:

1. zaperechuyuchi i ruynuyuchi passed dosvіd have to chislі passed modernіzatsіy (Radyans'ka perіod);
2. prodovzhuyuchi orієntuvatisya to "nazdoganyayuchu" model modernіzatsії;
3. zabuvayuchi scho Zahid їh to kіntsya not Priyma, bo stench INSHI;
4. іgnoruyuchi those scho i Zahid pochinaє zmіnyuvatis, i nazdoganyati vzhe bude nіkogo.

Dosvіd kraїn Pіvdenno-Shіdnoї Azії showing scho stink (Especially Yaponіya i Taїland) vіdmovilis od dvoh characterization vische modernіzatsії models Zroby stribok, vikoristovuyuchi zahіdnі tehnologії (the dosyagnuvshi їh rіvnya) i spirayuchis on vlasnі sotsіokulturnі basis SSMSC donedavna vvazhalisya pereponoyu to modernіzatsії.

In rezultatі Bulo zdіysneno not just perehіd to zahіdnoї suchasnostі and dosyagnuto konkurentospromozhnostі s zahіdnim svіtom scho zooms zblizhennya antagonіstichnih Figure traditsіynogo i Suchasnyj suspіlstv. Obviously Tsey dosvіd Mauger Buti vikoristany With Ukraine. However perspektivnіshoyu vidaєtsya orієntatsіya on kontseptsіyu postіndustrіalnogo іnformatsіynogo suspіlstva in osnovі yakoї lezhit postmodernism yak form podolannya superechnostey modernіzatsії, pereorієntatsії suchasnostі on glibshy її phone reception h i passed maybutnіm, traditsієyu that іnnovatsієyu. Vodnochase unaslіdok pritamannoї tsomu protsesovі globalіzatsії vinikayut zagrozi i riziki schodo rozvitku natsіonalnoї culture, znizhennya її rolі i funktsіy.

INCREASING multiculturalism not tіlki porodzhuє mozhlivі kulturnі konflіkti and second novі mozhlivostі entered for natsіonalnoї culture, but in fact razі, if modernіzatsіynі zmіni suprovodzhuyutsya poperednoyu pіdgotovkoyu mentalnostі to them s metoyu zabezpechennya odnochasnogo vihodu not tіlki on natsіonalnu, ale th planetary іdentichnіst.