This page has been robot translated, sorry for typos if any. Original content here.

Іstoriya Ukraine - Subtelny Orest

Activization Intellectuals

At 1961 p. Khrushchov, having reckoned with new praise of destinalization, the cult of the dictator’s march from the Kremlin mausoleum became a cultural achievement. Criticism of Stalin's expectation of a good news for the Ukrainians, good humor among their own people. The supervisors of the superevolvingly great enchantment, like that rock, were taken to the republic, the party clerks of Ukraine took their drink at the camp site and could act in the Kremlin further action. At the same time, in 1961, they are trying to make up for work, who wants to win a winkle with the Ukrainians through the problems of the state-sponsored virology, and Khrushchov was widely advertised in the price of Taras Shevchenko’s grave. Tim for an hour gained the strength of “vidliga” in cultural life: behind the cordon of publications published by B. Pasternak “Doctor Zhivago” , a kind of affirmation of zagolnulyudskі, and not so much gladness of the author (I would like to thank the author for the whole story) is the story of O. Solzhenitsyn, “One Day of Ivan Denisovich,” as in detail, I will describe the lives of the steel concentration camps. Zdavalosya, in fact, they punished for the possibility of further liberalization in literature and culture while angry the bourgeoisie, which was extended from the Kremlin.

In Ukraine, the cultural elite and in the past, the writers in the minds of destalinization have gone all the way to new challenges to expand the range of creative self-expression. I again wrote about the stench about the third, having scored the Ukrainian culture Stalin. The scribes of the older generation were selling vimagati reabilitation of their represenational colleagues. So, Oleksandr Kornіychuk having called out the publication “The Library of the Great 20s” for popularizing the works of Blakitny, Kulish, Kurbas and the victims of purges. The Russians started to achieve the same thing for the quietly, but in the 40s, they became victims of Kaganovich. I all tavruvali attack of Russification, scho prodovuzhuvsya.

Ale was especially marked by a new generation of beloved writers, critics and poets, such as Vasil Simonenko, Lina Kostenko, Yevgen Sverstyuk, Ivan Dzyuba, Ivan Drach, Mikola Vіngranovskiy and Dmitri Pavlichko , we advised I guarantee that the cultural development of the people cannot be stifled by the Maybut. In погhhnіy look, the most vіliti tsyu metu can be less "a turn of the truth to the truth." Since I’m very grateful for the indefinitely destined to understand, they’ve been able to improve the goodwill in helping to learn the literature, to have the right to experiment with different styles, and to keep the central part of the Ukrainian language. On the cob of the 60s of rock, representatives of the new generation in literature and yak began to call them “sixties”, they more than once saw the handshake of party officials, and they criticized hypocrisy, opportunism and supreme protection of their elders. With their rebellion, which was immediately hijacked by the control of the party, by the position of senior, valuable young people, clearly went beyond the establishment of Khrushchov’s framework of liberalization. Prior to that, the new literary cohort had developed a significant grandfather with a wide pdtrimkoy, especially in the middle of the young generation.